Disabled people sidelined as Sainsbury’s picks Paralympic torchbearers

Concerns have been raised about how members of the public are being chosen to take part in the Paralympic torch relay – a major event in the lead-up to this summer’s London 2012 games.

LOCOG, London 2012’s organising committee, is preparing to announce the nominees who have been chosen to carry the Paralympic torch from Stoke Mandeville to the Olympic Stadium in Stratford, east London, over 24 hours from 28 to 29 August.

In all, 580 disabled and non-disabled “torchbearers” will carry the flame in teams of five, with each team covering about half a mile.

Three London 2012 sponsors – Sainsbury’s, Lloyds TSB and BT – have each chosen about 140 people to take part in the relay from thousands of public nominations, with the other 150 or so to be selected by the International Paralympic Committee, LOCOG, the British Paralympic Association and other London 2012 sponsors.

Each of the three main relay sponsors has chosen a different way to select its torchbearers, with BT using one of Britain’s greatest Paralympians, Lee Pearson, to judge nominations.

But Disability News Service has discovered that one of the sponsors – Sainsbury’s – is using four non-disabled employees to pick its torchbearers.

Julie Newman, acting chair of the UK Disabled People’s Council, said Sainsbury’s decision made a mockery of disabled people’s often-repeated demand: “Nothing about us without us.”

She added: “It is so patronising. It is disrespectful and it discredits them rather than us.”

Dr Ju Gosling, co-chair of Regard, the lesbian gay bisexual and transgender disabled people’s organisation, added: “It seems like the whole way the Paralympics are shaping up.

“Ultimately, so much is happening without us. To my mind this just devalues everything the Paralympics stands for.”

A Sainsbury’s spokesman said: “The selection was carried out by four colleagues from different teams within Sainsbury’s.

“While none of the members of the panel have a disability, we did confirm our selections with both the British Paralympic Association and LOCOG for suitability purposes.”

No-one at LOCOG was available to comment.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Jack Ashley: Tributes paid to ‘trailblazing’ MP and peer

Tributes have been paid across the disability movement to Lord [Jack] Ashley, the UK’s first deaf MP and a hugely committed campaigner for disability rights for more than 40 years, who died on Friday (20 April).

Many spoke of his fearsome campaigning skills, his commitment to the rights of disabled people, and his personal charm, while he was once described by Labour’s Gordon Brown as “a shining beacon for honour and decency”.

Others highlighted his vital contribution to breaking down the barriers to disabled people’s participation in public life.

Jack Ashley lost his hearing in 1967, soon after being elected as a Labour MP, and would have resigned but was urged to stay on by the Labour prime minister, Harold Wilson.

Ashley learned to lip-read, and rebuilt what had been a promising political career – with the support of his wife, Pauline – working as a profoundly deaf MP for 25 years, before partially regaining his hearing through a cochlear implant after he had retired as an MP and been made a Labour peer.

Jack Ashley was prominent in a string of high-profile campaigns on behalf of disabled people over four decades, both as an MP and later as a member of the Lords.

One of the most successful was his parliamentary and public work to fight for compensation for people born with impairments caused by their mothers taking the drug thalidomide while pregnant in the late 1950s and early 1960s.

Guy Tweedy, a thalidomide survivor and a leading disabled activist himself, said: “He was a great inspiration for disabled people and for thalidomide victims in the UK. He was one of my heroes.

“Jack Ashley has a special place in our hearts because he brought it to the attention of the nation. He put pressure on the government and on Distillers [the company which marketed the drug thalidomide in the UK]. His contribution was massive.”

Tweedy points to a parliamentary debate in November 1972, which opened with Ashley describing Distillers’ efforts to avoid paying decent levels of compensation for 10 years as “a shocking example of man’s inhumanity to man, not to mention this firm’s inhumanity to the children”.

The MP went on to describe the company’s behaviour as “a grave national scandal, a display of moral irresponsibility which has seldom if ever been surpassed”.

As a result of working on Alf Morris’s ground-breaking chronically sick and disabled persons bill, Ashley had set up the all-party parliamentary disability group (APPDG) in 1969, which he continued to chair until 2009, then becoming its president.

He was the first MP to raise the issue of domestic violence in parliament, and campaigned for subtitling of television programmes, and for winter fuel payments for disabled people under 60 with high support needs.

He also played a leading role in pushing for disability discrimination legislation, introducing his own private members’ bill in 1983, paving the way more than 10 years later for the first Disability Discrimination Act.

More recently, he twice introduced another private members’ bill in the House of Lords, this time to try to guarantee disabled people a legal right to independent living. The bill won support in the Lords, but failed in the Commons because of government opposition.

Liz Sayce, chief executive of Disability Rights UK, which provides administrative support for the APPDG, and supported the independent living bill, said Lord Ashley had “transformed politics and placed disabled people’s right to choice and control at the very heart of the political debate”.

Lord Ashley’s fellow disabled peer, Baroness [Jane] Campbell, said she was “deeply saddened” to learn of his death and would “miss him very much”.

She worked with him for more than 25 years on numerous disability rights campaigns, and took over from him as co-chair of the APPDG in 2009.

She said: “He always understood what we were trying to achieve and did everything in his power to push our agenda hard in parliament.

“He was the most effective MP – and then Lord – I have ever met. I suspect this was due to his combination of personal experience of disability, political astuteness and wonderfully persuasive manner.

“He inspired me to take my knowledge and experience into the belly of the beast to fight alongside him and supported me every step of the way.”

She and Labour MP Anne McGuire, her APPDG co-chair, said later in a statement: “By speaking out powerfully against discrimination and neglect and campaigning for an equal society, Jack changed the lives of many disabled people and enabled them to lead fulfilling lives.

“Thanks to his efforts, human rights and non-discrimination legislation and measures to end disability poverty were introduced, whilst he raised a greater awareness of disability equality across the whole spectrum of government policy.

“As a deaf parliamentarian he paved the way for disabled people to become leaders and spokespersons in our democracy. He demonstrated that it is often a matter of attitude to break down barriers to political participation.”

Disabled activist Nick Danagher first met Ashley when he was visiting one of the first “integrated” schools – at which Danagher was a pupil – and said he made a “huge impression” on him and remained a “massive influence”.

He said: “We were used to having the great and the good visiting the unit but he would talk to people on an equal basis, telling us that our school was really important because of its modern approach.”

In later years, Danagher met Ashley several times as a disabled activist and found him “really charming and a really good communicator”.

“He could talk to disabled people with great credibility but he also got listened to by ministers. He was a great orator and sometimes great orators will appear very insincere, but you believed that he really truly believed what he was saying.”

He added: “He was on the inside of the establishment but still very much one of us. I think he was part of the movement. He brought that sort of statesmanlike authority to our messages about the need for legal rights, and not just for people to be nice to us.”

The disabled Labour MP Dame Anne Begg said it was the example of Jack Ashley that convinced her that she could become an MP herself.

Ashley, she said, was “a trailblazer” who had convinced the Commons authorities that he needed things done differently and that “there was not just one way of doing things”.

“I thought that if he and David Blunkett could do it, I could do it.”

She said that Ashley “would not take no for an answer”, but was also “a lovely, lovely man”, and someone who managed to build a cross-party consensus on the need for disability rights legislation.

She said it was his personal experience of disability that gave him the “edge” over other MPs who campaigned on disability rights, such as Alf Morris and Tom Clarke.

Lord Ashley was also vice-president of the National Deaf Children’s Society. The charity’s chief executive Susan Daniels said he was “a passionate advocate for deaf and disabled people” and an “inspirational figure”, and had left behind a “truly great legacy”.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

DisabledGo’s new IPhone app gets over 1000 downloads in just 4 weeks!

Our new IPhone App, ‘My DisabledGo London’ has received a fantastic response since it was released last month.  In just under 4 weeks it was downloaded by over 1000 people.

The App, which has been designed for anyone wanting to find out more about disabled access across the Capital, reached the top 40 of the UK navigation charts.

The App, which is based on feedback from over 100 involvement events held in 2011, has been developed in partnership with 20 London Boroughs.

We have been thrilled with the feedback we have received and the great suggestions of how we can improve and develop the App in the future.

Here is just a taste of the reviews received so far -

“Awesome, best app I have seen. It has pictures of bathroom layouts and details galore. I am a wheelchair user so I would use this app all the time in London. I want all cities to have an app like this one.”

“I wish I had this sooner! An amazing app giving you all the information you need to plan a trip! I feel so much more confident about going out. It’s so easy to use and looks great too!”

“Great App, really detailed information and miles away from the usual ‘disabled access’ one liners. Very impressed.”

So, if you haven’t downloaded the App yet why not give it a try and let us know what you think.  It’s totally free and available on App Store or you can visit DisabledGo’s website www.disabledgo.com for further information.

Please help us spread the word!

Naidex looks ahead to 2012

Naidex National takes place 1st-3rd May at the Birmingham NEC and is set to be an excellent show for healthcare professionals, trade, members of the public, and exhibitors alike. Registration for free tickets and more information on the event can be found at www.naidex.co.uk where you can also find details on all the products and services that will be on show along with details of the various features and activities available at Naidex 2012.

Event Director Liz Logan commented: “2012 is going to be a fantastic year in the history of Naidex and the excitement of the Paralympic Games is certainly giving the show a fresh buzz. We aim to provide visitors with an experience that will inspire and engage them, and with enhanced features and innovative new products on display a visit to Naidex National this year is a must for anyone affected by disability or long term illness. ”

Visitors to the 2012 event can expect to see all of the Naidex favourites that make visiting so worthwhile, such as the Car Zone, KideQuip and Meet the Expert, not forgetting the 1000s of independent living solutions being showcased by the Naidex exhibitors. There will also be a wealth of free help and advice provided by OTs, counsellors, speech & language therapists, physiotherapists and paediatric experts on a wide range of topics and issues, so start preparing your questions for the experts now. Among these features, healthcare professionals will benefit from attending the new Naidex Conference that will offer free CPD knowledge building and career enhancing seminars and workshops.

You can count on the Naidex team to bring you exciting new features and zones each year, ensuring that the show provides something for everyone, and 2012 is no exception. New features of Naidex National 2012 include the Sports and Rehab Zone, an area of the show dedicated to sports products and the latest specialist exercise equipment for home rehabilitation to help improve quality of life and productivity of users, and a Sensory Room displaying the latest in sensory toys and equipment.The Independent Living Show Home will be inviting visitors to see how the latest products work realistically within the home to improve independence, and with new product trails marked through the show floor it will be easier than ever to find what you are looking for.

Mark Butterworth has a profoundly disabled son who needs highly specialist equipment. He says that by visiting Naidex he and his family get all the help and advice they need: “We can get these products on the internet, but you can’t really compare or touch them, so it’s great to see everything together under one roof and get advice there and then. Naidex has everything we need and more; it really opens your eyes to what’s out there and we just wouldn’t know what’s available without coming.”

So if like Mark you are looking for the latest equipment and advice on what products are best suited to your budget and needs, put 1st-3rd May in your diary and make the most of visiting the UK’s largest disability, homecare and rehabilitation exhibition. Make it a fun day out and visit www.naidex.co.uk to register you, your friends and family for free tickets by quoting priority code EP1.

New access guide to Cheshire West and Chester goes live!

Cheshire West and Chester Council have joined our online access guide www.disabledgo.com providing a fantastic resource for anyone who wants to know more about access to the area.

The guide to Cheshire West and Chester covers over 1000 venues across the area including – cinemas, hotels, parks, leisure centres, state offices, high street stores, restaurants, tourist attractions – the list goes on and on.

The guide, which launched on Thursday 26th April at the Cheshire West and Chester HQ building will enable residents and visitors to find out whether venues have adapted toilets or parking close by but also specific details such as whether there are tactile or Braille markings in lifts or on doors, the dimensions of toilets, the positioning of fixtures and fittings and whether you can request large print or Braille information.

Speaking ahead of the launch, Councillor Brenda Dowding, Executive Member for Adult Social Care and Health said:

“Independence is an important part of everyone’s life. Cheshire West and Chester Council recognises this and is committed to continually improving services to make them more accessible for everyone within the community.”

“I am sure that the launch of this guide will have a wide-ranging, positive impact on disabled people living in, and visiting, our Borough. It will enable disabled people and their families and carers to make informed choices about which premises to visit.

“I am particularly impressed that the information contained in the guide has been researched by disabled people, for disabled people.”

DisabledGo have been working in Cheshire West and Chester with the support of the Council, as well as with the help of three local surveyors who have been trained and employed by DisabledGo especially for this project.

All of the information provided on DisabledGo-Cheshire West and Chester will also be available on the ‘Looking Local’ service on the red button on your TV, so if you don’t have access to a computer at home you can still get the information you need.

If you would like more information please contact Rachel Felton, External Relations Manager (E: rachel.felton@disabledgo.com T: 01438 842710).

Government forces legal aid cuts back into bill

Coalition MPs have overturned changes to government legislation that would have made it easier for many disabled people to apply for legal aid.

They backed a government amendment to the legal aid, sentencing and punishment of offenders bill, which reinstated plans for all those seeking legal aid to be forced to use a telephone helpline as their first point of contact.

The government wants to cut about £350 million a year from the £2 billion legal aid budget for England and Wales by 2014-15, but the telephone helpline measure would save less than £2 million a year.

Last month, the disabled peer Baroness [Tanni] Grey-Thompson spearheaded a successful amendment to the bill, which meant disabled people would have been able to access the system in the most accessible way for their own needs, such as a face-to-face meeting.

But Conservative justice minister Jonathan Djanogly told MPs, when the bill returned to the Commons this week, that using a telephone helpline as the first point of contact would “modernise the system and bring it up to date”.

He said that phone-based advice had often been shown “to be more convenient and accessible than face-to-face advice, particularly benefiting those living in remote areas or those who have a physical disability”.

But the Liberal Democrat MP Simon Hughes criticised his own government’s plans and said he was “not persuaded” that a telephone route was “right for everybody”, such as those with mental health conditions or learning difficulties.

And Labour’s shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan said the problems of many people with learning difficulties, mental health conditions or communication impairments could be “compounded” by having to explain their problems over the telephone.

There was a partial government concession on another area of the bill that had concerned disabled campaigners.

Last month, peers passed an amendment which would have ensured legal aid was retained to cover the initial appeals of people with complex benefits problems.

But justice secretary Kenneth Clarke told MPs this week that the government could not afford the £25 million a year cost in what was a “relatively low priority area”, as welfare benefits problems “should not generally require specialist advice”.

He did though offer a concession that would allow legal aid for benefits decisions that were being challenged “on a point of law” if those appeals reached the upper tribunal, court of appeal and Supreme Court.

He said the Ministry of Justice was discussing with the Department for Work and Pensions how this could also be extended to initial “first-tier” tribunal hearings for benefits appeals, again only for cases involving legal issues.

But Labour MP Jenny Chapman said social welfare law advice was vital to correct cases in which disabled people had been “blatantly wrongly assessed”.

She said Freedom of Information Act requests showed 32 claimants of employment and support allowance a week were dying after being found “fit for work” by the government’s much-criticised contractor, Atos Healthcare.

Chapman said: “Once internal reviews and first-tier tribunals are exhausted, further appeals can only be on points of law and not on the facts of a case.

“The government’s acceptance of higher courts and not tribunals is like saying, ‘Here’s a penthouse, but we’ve locked the staircase and lifts.’ Far too many disabled people will not get the help they need.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Banks must do more on access, says charity

A disability charity is calling on the banking industry to do more to make its services accessible to blind and partially-sighted people.

RNIB issued the call as it published a new guide offering advice to the financial industry on how to improve services for almost two million people living with sight loss in the UK.

RNIB research from 2009 found less than a third of blind and partially-sighted people could manage their finances independently, while nine in ten told a survey last year that they found it difficult or impossible to use a cash machine on their own.

The new guide, The Banking Experience, also says that more than a third of blind and partially-sighted people still do not receive their bank statements in their preferred format.

Lesley-Anne Alexander, RNIB’s chief executive, said: “Being able to manage your money is an essential component to leading an independent life.

“It is shocking that the majority of blind and partially-sighted people aren’t able to independently use ATMs [cash machines], and that a significant number still do not receive financial information in accessible formats.

“We hope this new guide will help banks to better meet the needs of their blind and partially-sighted customers.”

The new guide – due to be launched next week in the City of London – points out that clearer signage, better support from staff, and improved online services would also benefit older people and disabled people with other impairments.

It offers advice on areas such as customer service and disability awareness training; physical access within bank branches; the accessibility of over-the-counter services; online and telephone banking; and access to information.

The guide also calls for more banks to introduce talking cash machines, an issue RNIB has been campaigning on since last September.

One of the blind and partially-sighted people RNIB talked to for the guide said: “I’m desperate for ATMs [cash machines] to be made more accessible to blind and partially-sighted people.

“It would make such a difference to be able to draw out money in this way without having to reply on my fiancé and would enable me to feel so much more independent.”

The guide has been endorsed by the British Bankers’ Association and Martin Lewis, founder of the website MoneySavingExpert.com.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Websites suffer in comparison with decent access standards

Leading price comparison websites are ignoring their legal obligations to make their sites accessible to disabled people, according to a new report.

The disability charity AbilityNet, which analysed the accessibility of five sites for its report, said disabled people should be a significant market for any retail website, because they “often have less cash and less opportunity to shop around the physical high street”.

The charity tested the accessibility of Compare the Market, Go Compare, mySupermarket, Kelkoo and Confused.com.

Not one of the five achieved the three-star rating that indicates a basic level of accessibility for disabled people.

It found four of them – with one star each – were potentially breaching the Equality Act, while Kelkoo – the only site to gain two stars – only satisfied some legal accessibility requirements.

One blind user of screen-reading software who tested the mySupermarket site said they would rather “starve” than use it to buy groceries.

Robin Christopherson, AbilityNet’s head of digital inclusion, said: “Like everyone else in these hard times, the country’s 12 million disabled people want to get the best deal when they’re shopping, whether that’s for insurance, groceries or anything else.

“But these cash-strapped shoppers are losing out due to badly-designed web pages that prevent them from shopping around and accessing the online bargains they need to make ends meet.”

He added: “It is just as illegal to bar disabled visitors from accessing your goods and services online as it would be to keep them out of your shop in the ‘real world’.”

A Compare the Market spokeswoman said: “We are always looking at ways to improve what we do and we have taken AbilityNet’s report very seriously.

“We are reviewing the report and looking at their findings and after that process has concluded we will see what changes we can make.”

Chris Simpson, chief marketing officer for Kelkoo, said his company would “look carefully at the findings of this research and, where possible, review our practices to improve this experience for disabled people”.

He said: “We are certainly open to further talks with AbilityNet to understand more about the study and how we can improve our score going forward.”

A Gocompare.com spokeswoman said: “We’re keen that Gocompare.com should be easily accessible to as many users as possible.

“We welcome this report and will be looking carefully at the findings to see where improvements can be made.”

No-one from Confused.com was able to comment, and mySupermarket did not reply to requests for a response to the report.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

UKDPC shrugs off trustee resignations

Four disabled activists have resigned from the board of the UK’s leading disabled people’s organisation following a disagreement over its future direction.

The trustees who resigned from the UK Disabled People’s Council’s (UKDPC) national council – Mark Harrison, Anne Novis, Tara Flood and Rachel Hurst – had played major roles in renewing and restructuring the organisation over the last four years.

All four declined to explain why they had resigned.

Harrison is chief executive of Norfolk Coalition of Disabled People and was chair of UKDPC’s international committee, Novis is a leading authority and campaigner on disability hate crime, Flood is director of the Alliance for Inclusive Education, and Hurst is a veteran activist and former director of Disability Awareness in Action.

UKDPC is now seeking up to 12 new disabled trustees – including five from under-represented groups – to be co-opted onto its national council until an election early next year.

Newman paid tribute to the four former trustees, and said: “They have given a lot of years of hard and good service and have been a significant part of keeping the organisation going and developing.

“I wish them well and recognise the hard work they have put in over the last four-and-a-half years to stabilise, renew and reorganise the organisation.”

Jaspal Dhani, UKDPC’s chief executive, said: “The organisation’s agenda has been slowly developing over the last four or five years and it has reached a point where it is looking at its objectives, at the people involved and its strategy, and the resigning officers felt that they no longer had a role in the future direction of UKDPC.

“We are now looking to recruit new trustees to take the organisation forward into the next stages of its development.”

He said the resignations came at a point when UKDPC was recruiting a new member of staff to boost membership, and for the first time seeking member organisations from among disabled-led businesses, although they will not have voting rights.

UKDPC is also playing a leading role in monitoring the UK government’s implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

And it is organising a high-profile international disability arts festival in the Paralympic borough of Newham, to coincide with the London 2012 Paralympics, from 29 August to 9 September.

Newman said: “This is a very exciting time. It is genuinely a time of growth for UKDPC.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Cuts protest brings traffic chaos to central London

Disabled activists have again brought traffic chaos to central London by chaining their wheelchairs across busy pedestrian crossings in protest at government cuts and welfare reforms.

The focus of the two-hour protest in Trafalgar Square was on the demand for the government to scrap its controversial new Welfare Reform Act, which includes plans for heavy cuts to disability benefits.

It was the second such protest this year in London’s tourist heartland by the campaign group Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), with support again from the mainstream anti-cuts movement UK Uncut, following a similar action in late January at Oxford Circus.

The protest started at about 2pm yesterday (Wednesday) in Leicester Square, with activists marching along Charing Cross Road towards Trafalgar Square.

Lines of wheelchair-users then blocked two of the main roads at the southern end of Trafalgar Square by chaining themselves to pedestrian crossings, a tactic also used successfully in the Oxford Circus protest.

Within minutes, buses, cars and taxis were backed up along all the roads in and out of Trafalgar Square.

Although police officers soon moved in to cut the chains, they made no attempt to physically move wheelchairs from the road, and many of the protesters continued to block the roads for two hours.

John McArdle, a founding member of Black Triangle, who travelled from Scotland for the protest with three other members of the campaign group, said: “Disabled people do not like to inconvenience the citizens of London, but we had to get out on the streets of London and let the people know what is happening in their name.”

Linda Burnip, a member of DPAC’s steering group, said protests would continue until the government listened to their demands.

Adam Lotun, another DPAC member, and one of the wheelchair-users blocking the roads, warned that protests were likely during the Olympic and Paralympic Games, although Burnip said they would be unlikely to disrupt sports fans attending London 2012 events.

Lotun admitted there was a chance the public could turn against protesters if they disrupted London 2012, but added: “There is a risk, but we have to make a stand. We have been ignored and we are treated as second-class citizens.”

Mark Harrison, chief executive of Norfolk Coalition of Disabled People (NCODP), who also took part in the protest, warned that disabled people would only feel the worst of the impact of the cuts over the next couple of years.

He said: “My main message to the government is: ‘You are in trouble. This is just the beginning of the fight.’”

He said the presence of NCODP and other disabled people’s organisations (DPOs) at the protest showed that they were “the voice of disabled people and are out there leading the fight against this government and attacks on their human rights”, even though the future of DPOs like NCODP were at risk.

He said: “While companies like Atos and A4E make millions in profit off the back of disabled people, disabled people are suffering and DPOs are going to the wall.”

He insisted that it was realistic to fight for the Welfare Reform Act to be scrapped, and compared the campaign to the successful battle against the poll tax more than 20 years ago.

Another of the wheelchair-users who blocked the roads, Sue Elsegood, from Greenwich, said she was protesting because she was “really concerned about the cuts to disabled people’s benefits and services, particularly the Independent Living Fund”.

She added: “I think [the protest] is about disabled people having their voices heard and saying they won’t accept this kind of treatment.

“If enough people speak out, the government will have to listen. There are people committing suicide about this issue.”

Another wheelchair-user, Maz, from Sussex, said disabled people were “petrified” by the planned cuts, with some killing themselves because of cuts or the fear of cuts to their support, while others had died while waiting for their appeals against being found “fit for work” by assessors working for Atos.

He said: “People fear that they are going to lose their independence, their homes, their carers.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Sports bosses must improve on inclusion, says minister

Sports governing bodies must do much more to encourage disabled people to play sport regularly, according to the cabinet minister responsible for the London 2012 Paralympics.

Jeremy Hunt, the Conservative secretary of state for culture, Olympics, media and sport, told a conference organised by the government that he wanted to “call time on piecemeal, tokenistic nods to inclusion” by sports organisations.

The 2012 Disability Sports Summit, at Arsenal Football Club’s Emirates Stadium, was the first such event focused on boosting disabled people’s participation in sport, and was attended by scores of senior figures from sports governing bodies and disability organisations.

Hunt said the Paralympic Games would be one of the biggest opportunities to create a permanent “legacy” from London 2012, and he wanted to see more disabled people “pick up a sporting habit for life”, with Britain setting a “global benchmark for inclusion” in sport.

He said the participation rate of disabled people was currently “far too low”, with only one in six disabled adults playing sport every week.

Hunt, a former shadow minister for disabled people, said he had insisted that all schools taking part in the new School Games provided opportunities for competitive sport for disabled children.

He said the School Games was showing that through “quite simple adjustments”, disabled and non-disabled children could compete on a “totally equal basis”, creating opportunities for disabled children and transforming the attitudes of non-disabled children.

He also called for a “stronger sense of common purpose” among those involved in grassroots disability sport, in order to bring in more corporate investment.

And he suggested that the increasing personalisation of care and support provided a “big opportunity” to increase participation by encouraging disabled people to use part of their personal budgets to fund regular sporting activity and so improve their “health and well-being”.

Chris Holmes, winner of nine Paralympic swimming gold medals before his retirement and now director of Paralympic integration for the 2012 organising committee LOCOG, said he hoped the efforts made to integrate the Olympics and Paralympics for the first time would send “ripples out not just across sport but across education, employment and society”.

He said he hoped the Paralympics would cause a “lightning storm” across the country, “to spark thousands of hearts and minds” among sports administrators, governing bodies and disabled people.

Jennie Price, chief executive of Sport England, who also spoke at the summit, said disability sport was now a “major priority” for her organisation, with the focus on participation in non-elite level sport for disabled adults.

Sport England is to invest £8 million from its Places People Play programme to address barriers to disabled people’s sporting participation.

Price said that only 11 of 46 sports governing bodies had set targets for including disabled people, while participation rates were just over half those of non-disabled people.

Several leading disabled figures warned Hunt and Price at the summit that much more needed to be done by the sports sector.

Julie Newman, acting chair of the UK Disabled People’s Council (UKDPC), said one of the biggest barriers to inclusion was the frequent “prejudice” shown by sports governing bodies.

She told Disability News Service later that more disabled people must be represented on governing bodies, while sports organisations needed to do more to engage with disabled people, for example through disability equality training and diversity strategies led and created by disabled people.

Mike Brace, a member of LOCOG’s diversity board and a trustee of the Disability Sports Development Trust, warned Hunt that many disabled children were not receiving their compulsory two hours a week of physical education.

Saghir Alam, patron of Include Me Too, which works with black and minority ethnic (BME) and other marginalised disabled children, warned of the challenge of including children from these communities in grassroots sport when so many disabled people’s organisations were closing down or struggling with funding.

And Jaspal Dhani, UKDPC’s chief executive and a wheelchair basketball player for 30 years, called for action to address the very low participation rates of BME communities in disability sport.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

True impact of DLA cuts ‘could wipe out planned savings’

The knock-on effects of the government’s huge cuts to spending on disability living allowance (DLA) could wipe out every penny of the savings it is hoping for, according to a new report.

The Disability Rights UK (DR UK) report, Impact Assessing the Abolition of Working Age DLA, accuses the government of ignoring the effects on disabled people’s lives of cutting working-age DLA spending by 20 per cent, or £1.4 billion a year by 2015/16.

The report analyses the likely impact on disabled people’s ability to work, and their extra need for NHS services and local authority support.

It says that the government’s claim that there will be no such knock-on effects is a “falsehood” and describes its failure to carry out a proper analysis as “irresponsible”.

DR UK estimates that the extra costs could wipe out any planned savings, and even its lowest estimates add up to more than a third of the government’s intended savings. The report’s estimates range from about £600 million a year to as much as £3 billion.

DR UK also points to last month’s report by the joint committee on human rights, which warned of a “significant risk” that the government’s welfare reforms and cuts to disability benefits and services could put disabled people’s right to independent living at risk.

DR UK is among about 20 organisations examining potential legal challenges to parts of the new Welfare Reform Act, which will see working-age DLA replaced by a new personal independence payment (PIP), among many other cuts to benefits and sweeping reforms to the welfare system.

Neil Coyle, DR UK’s director of policy and campaigns, said: “It is a very real prospect that the government will see a challenge to the Welfare Reform Act, or multiple challenges.”

The new report uses figures from a survey carried out last year, which found 56 per cent of disabled people with jobs said they would have to stop or reduce that work if they lost their DLA, while one in six would be forced to make more use of the NHS, and one in seven would need to make greater use of council services.

It uses these figures to estimate the cost to the government of lost tax and national insurance, and extra payments of out-of-work benefits.

It also estimates the cost of obtaining independent medical evidence from GPs and consultants as part of the new PIP assessment process, and of extra spending on GP appointments and hospital stays as a result of reduced support.

Finally, the report adds in the possible costs of extra council support at home or in residential homes, due to disabled people being less able to live independently.

A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) spokeswoman disputed DR UK’s figures and said the reforms had been “open to an unprecedented level of examination from stakeholders, members of the public to politicians” and that DWP had consulted widely with disabled people and their organisations.

Asked by Disability News Service whether it would now carry out an analysis of the knock-on effects of the cuts, she said DWP had “already committed to publishing more information when it becomes available”.

She added: “The changes to DLA will make sure support goes to those who need it most, with more support going to a higher proportion under PIP.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Government hears suggestions for fulfilling potential

Tackling the bureaucratic barriers faced by disabled people, a list of the top disability-friendly employers, and recruiting more disabled teachers, are just some of the suggestions for how the government can improve disabled people’s lives.

The ideas were among more than 500 responses to Fulfilling Potential, a discussion document issued by the Office for Disability Issues (ODI) in December, which will feed into the new cross-government disability strategy that is due to be published in late spring.

ODI says it wants the strategy to “tackle barriers to realising aspirations and individual control, as well as change attitudes and behaviour towards disabled people”.

And it says it will build on the Labour government’s work, including the Improving the Life Chances of Disabled People report, the Independent Living Strategy, and Roadmap 2025, as well as the UK government’s commitment to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Nearly half of the responses to the discussion document came from individual disabled people.

Among the suggestions in the “realising aspirations” category were for ODI to have its own “red tape challenge”, asking disabled people to identify wasteful and bureaucratic barriers; to spend more of the special educational needs budget on supporting disabled children in mainstream education; and to fund a list of the top disability-friendly employers, similar to the annual league table of gay-friendly workplaces produced by the charity Stonewall.

Among comments in the “individual control” section were calls for stronger advocacy programmes and support for disabled people’s user-led organisations; a warning that some support services were being restricted to disabled people with “critical” needs; and calls for a focus on barriers to buildings, transport and information to ensure people enjoy choice and control of their support.

In the changing attitudes and awareness category, suggestions included a call for more disabled teachers, healthcare professionals and local councillors; a greater focus on implementing and enforcing the Equality Act; and fresh claims that Department for Work and Pensions press releases on benefit fraud have increased disability hate crime.

Maria Miller, the Conservative minister for disabled people, told an event held to discuss the feedback last week: “I want to make clear that from the very top of government we are absolutely committed to achieving a step change in supporting disabled people to fulfil their potential in every area of life.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Scottish GPs call for ‘fitness for work’ tests to be scrapped

Disabled activists have hailed as a major victory a decision by Scottish GPs to call on the government to abandon its controversial “fitness for work” tests.

Doctors at the British Medical Association’s (BMA) annual Scottish conference of GPs voted for a motion that called for the “inadequate, computer-based assessments” to be abandoned in favour of a “rigorous and safe” system that does not cause “avoidable harm” to disabled people and those with long-term health conditions.

The motion said the work capability assessment (WCA), the test introduced by the Labour government in 2008 to assess people’s eligibility for out-of-work disability benefits, has “little regard to the nature or complexity” of disabled people’s needs.

The Scottish-based campaign group Black Triangle played a key role in having the motion tabled at last week’s conference.

There are hopes that a similar motion could now be proposed at the UK national conference – which will include GPs from England, Wales and Northern Ireland as well as Scotland – to be held in May in Liverpool.

Dr Stephen Carty, an Edinburgh GP and Black Triangle member, said the Scottish conference’s support sent “a ray of hope” to many sick and disabled people.

He said the WCA was “not an effective or safe method of determining ‘fitness to work’”, and he called on the General Medical Council (GMC) to speak out on the issue.

He said: “All doctors are duty bound by the General Medical Council to report any system or process that may be harmful to patients. The WCA is a harmful process. Scottish GPs have spoken: the GMC cannot remain silent on this matter any longer.”

BMA Scotland said it did not keep a record of how many of the 100 or so doctors who attended the conference had voted for the motion.

But Dr Dean Marshall, who chairs the BMA’s Scottish general practitioners committee, said the BMA agreed with the need for welfare reform and to “provide more opportunities for those people who are able to work”.

But he said patients were “very concerned and confused with regards to these assessments. Many are in fear of how they will cope with the removal of, or cuts to, their benefits.

“Evidence appears to suggest that people with serious health conditions are frequently declared fit for work.”

John McArdle, a founding member of Black Triangle, called for the assessments to be halted while the GMC carried out a “thorough investigation”.

He said: “The scandal of these assessments has gone on far too long. As a grassroots disabled people’s organisation we are over the moon that Scotland’s GPs have spoken out so clearly and unequivocally in their condemnation.

“Our GPs recognise the severe and avoidable damage that is being done to sick and disabled people through this brutal, draconian and profoundly unjust testing regime as they see it every single day.”

The GMC declined to comment.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Disabled MPs warn of danger of legalising assisted suicide

Two disabled MPs have spoken out strongly against any moves towards legalising assisted suicide.

The two Conservative MPs, Paul Maynard and Robert Halfon, spoke during a Commons debate this week, the first time MPs have discussed the issue in depth for more than 40 years.

They were debating a motion that welcomed the guidelines published in 2010 by the director of public prosecutions (DPP), Keir Starmer.

The guidance, which applies to England, Wales and Northern Ireland, lists the factors to be considered in deciding whether to charge someone with assisted suicide.

An analysis of the speeches made during the debate suggests that 27 of the MPs were opposed to legalising assisted suicide, while 19 were in favour.

Maynard told MPs that he “fundamentally” rejected any moves towards legalisation.

He said: “If we decide that our own lives are no longer ‘worth living’, we make it harder for a person with an identical condition, disability or prognosis to take a brave decision, to strike out and say, ‘Actually, I want to keep on living. I do not want to succumb to the group-think that says I am now a burden on society.’

“It is not for society to decide the value of human life. It is not even for one single individual to decide that their life is no longer worth living, because by doing so they diminish the right of every other human being to decide that their life is worth living.”

Halfon said he believed society should “put everything into helping people to live, not helping people to die”.

He argued that influential research in early 1920s Germany that “argued strenuously that doctors should be protected against prosecution for assisted dying” helped create the “intellectual climate” that allowed the removal of support for terminally-ill and disabled people, and later led to Hitler’s programme of targeted mass killing of disabled people.

The Conservative MP Fiona Bruce quoted the disabled crossbench peer Baroness [Jane] Campbell, who believes that legalisation would “alter the mindset of the medical and social care professions, persuading more and more people that actually the prospect of an ‘easy’ way out is what people such as me really want”.

The Labour MP Jim Dobbin, who has two disabled grandsons, said: “I do not want them, or any other person living with a disability, to experience pressure in a system whose law suggests that their lives might not be worth living.”

Edward Garnier, the Conservative solicitor-general, also spoke out against any change in the law, and calls from some MPs to place the DPP’s guidance on a statutory basis.

He said: “I want to emphasise the importance of the independence of prosecutors and the undesirability of statutory guidelines for prosecutors in any area of law, not least this one.”

Another Conservative MP, Nadine Dorries, said there were many disabled people who – if the law was changed – would “suddenly feel very vulnerable, because they could imagine a point in time when they are aware of what they cost the NHS, the state or wherever they are being cared for”.

The Labour MP Frank Field said he did not share the view that the country was “populated exclusively by husbands who love their wives, and wives who love their husbands”.

He said: “I know perfectly well that in certain circumstances some individuals would have no hesitation in trying to persuade a person that the decent thing to do is to end their life – and especially where money is involved.”

Many MPs also spoke out in favour of an amendment that called for further development of palliative care and hospice provision.

But some MPs did back moves towards legalising assisted suicide.

The Conservative MP Richard Ottaway, who proposed the original motion welcoming the guidelines, said: “Even if we can provide universal access to good-quality end-of-life care, some Britons will still seek to end their lives. The law must be equipped to deal with such cases and to help the vulnerable.”

The Labour MP Paul Blomfield told how his 87-year-old father had committed suicide last year after being diagnosed with terminal lung cancer.

He said: “If the law had made it possible, he could, and I am sure he would, have shared his plans.

“He would have been able to say goodbye and to die with his family around him and not alone in a carbon monoxide-filled garage. He and many more like him deserved better.”

Another Labour MP, Paul Flynn, read out a letter from a constituent whose terminally-ill wife had deliberately starved herself to death.

He accused MPs of “cowardice” for not acting to legalise assisted suicide, and said: “Some 80 per cent of people in this country want us to change things.

“It is up to us, as their representatives, to bring in reforms that will give people the peace of mind that they can die with dignity.”

The Labour MP Dame Joan Ruddock, who also backs legalisation, had proposed an amendment calling for the DPP’s guidance to be placed on a statutory footing, but she did not ask for it to be put to a vote.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Campaigns will highlight transport barriers in lead-up to London 2012

Two new high-profile campaigns are set to highlight the barriers that disabled people face when trying to use public transport.

The A2BForAll campaign, which has been backed by several leading disabled people’s organisations, published research this week showing that more than half of disabled users have felt discriminated against when trying to access public transport.

More than half of the 200 disabled people questioned said they had been forced to find other ways to travel because of the treatment they received on public transport.

The campaign, headed by Baroness [Tanni] Grey-Thompson, wants the government to appoint a regulator – funded by the transport industry – to improve staff training, and keep a central register of complaints that would play a key part in awarding public transport franchises.

The campaign has grown out of legal action being taken by 16 disabled people in Darlington against the bus company Arriva North East (ANE).

Gordon Pybus, chair of Darlington Association on Disability, which has supported them in their legal action and backs the campaign, said accessible public transport was vital with the government reforming the benefits system and calling for more disabled people to find work, particularly with many likely to lose their Motability vehicles because of disability living allowance reform.

He said: “To allow us to do that, we must have a transport infrastructure that is really accessible for all disabled people.”

The Liberal Democrat transport minister Norman Baker said: “While a regulator might look superficially attractive, it could cause duplication with work already being done by Passenger Focus [the rail watchdog] and Bus Users UK [the bus passengers’ organisation], and it will almost certainly add to costs.”

A2BForAll is also being backed by user-led charities Transport For All, Trafford Centre for Independent Living, and Derbyshire Coalition for Inclusive Living, and is funded by legal firm Unity Law.

They hope to secure more than 100,000 signatures on a petition backing the demands, so the issue can be debated by MPs.

Channel 4 News has also launched its own campaign, to investigate the state of accessible public transport in the lead-up to the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics.

Channel 4 News wants its No Go Britain campaign to build up a comprehensive picture by asking disabled viewers for their experiences.

Alison Walsh, Channel 4’s disability advisor, said: “The stories that the Channel 4 News team reveal, and the picture they build across the country, should form the basis for serious discussion about how we can improve the system for disabled users.”

Baroness Grey-Thompson told Channel 4 News that she had been forced to crawl off a train earlier this year because there were no staff on the platform to receive her late-night train.

She said: “I think as a disabled person travelling, you always have an element of fear or just feeling very uncomfortable, of panic, of wondering whether you’re going to get off.”

She said she wanted to see many more disabled people using public transport, but “unless there are some massive changes – not only to the equipment but to staff training – we’re not going to get more disabled people using public transport”.

Baker said his department was “working hard to ensure that all transport staff have the appropriate disability awareness training”, and has supported a disability awareness training module for the bus industry. About two-thirds of bus drivers have now had awareness training, he said.

He added: “We recommend that transport operators involve disabled people themselves in developing the training, and that both front line and management staff are trained and their skills regularly updated.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

MP hints at Labour bias towards inclusive education

The MP leading a review of Labour’s special educational needs (SEN) policy has suggested it will recommend a far more inclusive approach than the coalition government’s anti-inclusion stance.

Sharon Hodgson, the shadow minister for children and families, was taking evidence from campaigners at an event organised by the Alliance for Inclusive Education (ALLFIE).

Tara Flood, ALLFIE’s director, said the Labour party was now in a “fantastic” position to “do something innovative, to do something creative and brave” on inclusion, but must first realise that the “current system isn’t working”.

She said: “This is the chance when the current government are so determined in terms of inclusion to turn the clock back 30 years. Those of us who succeed do that despite the current system.”

Nicholas Russell, co-chair of Labour’s disabled members group, said the review needed to address the bullying of disabled pupils.

He said: “If you deal with bullying in schools then hopefully you will have a lot less disability hate crime.”

He also called for the review to recommend that more disabled people become school governors, and are given the support they need to do that.

Simone Aspis, ALLFIE’s policy and campaigns coordinator, told Hodgson that disabled people must have “complete human and civil rights to access mainstream education”, while there must be a focus on the barriers that need to be removed to enable disabled people to learn.

Hodgson, whose son is disabled, said she believed that including disabled children in mainstream schools would help other children grow up without prejudice, which was “why we really have to fight for this”.

She said she disagreed with David Cameron’s view that there was a “bias towards inclusion” in the education system.

And she suggested that her review would recommend mandatory SEN training for all student teachers, with schools also forced to use one of their five annual “inset” training days to improve their teachers’ SEN knowledge.

Sarifa Patel, ALLFIE’s co-chair, told Hodgson that disability history should be taught in schools, while teachers should be taught about the social model of disability during their training.

She also pointed out that parents of disabled children from black and minority ethnic communities faced the additional barrier of institutional racism in the education system.

Miro Griffiths, a disability equality consultant, said schools must understand how disabled young people can be supported into employment through schemes such as Access to Work.

Lucy Bartley, whose husband Jonathan challenged David Cameron in front of TV cameras during the 2010 election campaign on the Conservative leader’s pledge to “end the bias towards the inclusion of children with special needs in mainstream schools”, said the resistance they had faced in trying to ensure their disabled son Samuel attended a mainstream school had been “all about attitudes”.

She said his eventual inclusion had changed the culture of the school, and added: “Enabling our children to be within mainstream provision changes that provision.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Pregnant women and children ‘could swamp airlines with access demands’

New guidance could see older people, children, obese people and pregnant women receive protection under European laws on air travel for disabled people, a leading user-led organisation has warned.

The air travel regulations, introduced across the European Union in 2007 and 2008, were intended to provide disabled people and those with restricted mobility with equal opportunities to travel by air.

The regulations provided new rights for disabled people to access air travel, including booking flights, checking in at the airport, assistance to board the plane, and compensation for damaged equipment.

But new draft guidance, produced by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) – and intended to help the industry prepare for the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics – suggests extending these rights to other groups with temporarily-reduced mobility, such as children, older people, pregnant women and obese people.

In a letter to Siim Kallas, vice-president of the European Commission with responsibility for transport, the European Disability Forum (EDF) warns that such a move would cause “considerable operational difficulties” for the aviation industry and make it harder for disabled people to travel by air.

EDF says in the letter that its concerns about the guidance appear to have been ignored by DG MOVE, as a second draft of the guidance has failed to take its concerns into account.

Yannis Vardakastanis, EDF’s president, says in the letter that disabled people could find it harder to obtain assistance because of an increase in the number of groups needing to alert airlines in advance of flying.

He warns that this could mean disabled people being “denied boarding as the number of people in the flight needing assistance may increase considerably”.

And he says that airports and airlines could be “faced with unprecedented demands for assistance, may require justification and proof for passengers or make wrong assumptions on real needs creating further discrimination for persons with disabilities”.

He concludes that the guidelines would “seriously undermine” the purpose of the regulations, which was to protect disabled people against discrimination, and ensure they receive assistance when flying.

He says: “We believe that the proposal for guidelines should be withdrawn as, despite its good intentions, it will undoubtedly water down or even shelve the regulation and further exacerbate problems in its implementation.”

A spokesman for the European Commission said: “We confirm receipt of this letter, and the commission will of course attentively consider the concerns raised in the letter.”

The regulations are enforced in the UK by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which declined to comment on the proposed new guidance as it said its actions would be based on the legislation itself rather than any guidelines.

Meanwhile, CAA has launched a campaign to show the aviation industry how to prepare and load electric mobility aids onto aircraft safely, and ensure they arrive undamaged.

It said the campaign followed “several safety incidents” involving electric mobility aids, including one which caught fire as it was being unloaded.

CAA has produced a training video, which covers each step of the process, from booking a flight, through check-in, to loading an electric wheelchair or mobility scooter into an aircraft’s hold.

It has also published an official safety notice to remind all airlines and airports of their obligations.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Special school to close after teenager’s padded room ordeal

The mother of a teenager with autism who was repeatedly confined to a padded room at his residential special school has spoken of the “remarkable” progress he has made since a court ruled his treatment was unlawful.

The 19-year-old was often prevented from leaving the so-called “Blue Room” at Beech Tree School, near Preston, which is run by the disability charity Scope.

The mother of the young man – known only as C – has only now been able to speak out publicly after a judge lifted an anonymity order which had prevented any naming of the school or the local authority involved, Wigan Council.

C’s mother took the council to the Court of Protection, which ruled 12 months ago that it was a breach of her son’s rights to confine him to the padded room to control his “challenging behaviour” – at one stage on 192 occasions in just one month – without seeking a court order under the Mental Capacity Act authorising the school to deprive him of his liberty.

In delivering his ruling last year, Mr Justice Ryder concluded that the failure to provide C with the “specialist, qualified care and treatment” he clearly needed was “unacceptable”.

C’s mother said the improvement her son had made in the last year had vindicated the family’s battle.

Her son now enjoys walks in the country and trips to a swimming pool, while his attention span and vocabulary have “dramatically increased”.

She said: “The ‘professionals’ within the named organisations each had the authority to halt the tragic existence of my son’s incarceration within the Blue Room but failed in their duty to do so over a considerable period of time.

“His elder brother and I have witnessed the practice of seclusion enough to know that it is unnatural, particularly cruel to someone with the diagnosis of C and serves only to dehumanize, and there should be no place for its use in  21st century ‘care’.”

C’s brother added: “He has gained weight, grown taller and shows affection to those around him. I can now enjoy a relationship with him where we laugh and have fun, which is something I hadn’t seen my brother do for some time.”

Mathieu Culverhouse, a lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, which helped the family win the case, said: “This shocking case is one in which the responsible authorities failed to obtain the legal authorisation needed to deprive someone of their liberty.

“It’s clear from the progress C has made over the past nine months that the unlawful treatment he was receiving was not working.”

As a result of the case, and falling pupil numbers, Scope has decided to close the school.

Tara Flood, director of the Alliance for Inclusive Education, said: “On the one hand it is good to see a special school closing but it is terrible it took such an appalling breach of human rights for the decision to be made.”

Richard Hawkes, Scope’s chief executive, said the charity was “very sorry” that C “didn’t get the support he needed”.

He said: “It took us too long to realise that we had become over-reliant on an approach that wasn’t working.”

He said it had been a “really challenging case” and that the charity had acted with “nothing but the best intentions”.

He added: “We tried too hard and for too long, to manage a very difficult situation without securing the right combination of external expertise and support.”

Wigan Council declined to comment.

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com

Strong backing for pan-London funding appeals

User-led groups across London are hoping to convince local authorities to continue funding two vital areas of support for disabled people and their organisations.

London Councils – the umbrella organisation for the capital’s local authorities – has just finished a consultation on which areas it will continue to fund through its grants programme. Decisions are due in May.

Last week, service-users, staff, trustees and supporters of Transport for All handed in their response, backed by more than 60 organisations, many of them user-led groups. They want London Councils to continue funding support for accessible transport.

TfA points to the need for services that support disabled and older people to access transport as London prepares to host the Olympics and Paralympics this summer.

TfA’s funding from London Councils is due to end this September, just as the Paralympics draws to a close.

London Councils has been funding TfA since 2008 to provide information, advice and advocacy services to disabled and older people, and to support London’s 25 community transport schemes.

A separate response to the consultation, from Inclusion London, and backed by about 50 organisations and leading disabled activists, calls on London Councils to continue to fund schemes that support the capital’s Deaf and disabled people’s organisations (DDPOs).

Inclusion London is the only organisation funded by London Councils to strengthen the capital’s DDPOs and support them to influence policy and speak out on Deaf and disability equality issues.

It was London Councils funding four years ago that enabled Inclusion London to be set up. This funding is also set to end in September.

Inclusion London says in its submission that its support is needed “now more than ever” because of the “perfect storm” facing the capital’s DDPOs.

It points to huge cuts to benefits, social care support and legal aid, and rising disability hate crime, leading to growing demand for advice and support, while “massive cuts” to funding mean one in five London DDPOs faces closure over the coming year.

Last year, a judge told London Councils to rethink plans to slash spending on its grants programme because it had failed to assess properly how the cuts would affect disabled people and other minority groups.

The plans included slimming down its funding priorities, with accessible transport one of those areas to be dropped.

London Councils has now carried out a fresh consultation on which areas it should fund, but the grants budget has already plunged from £20.8 million in 2011-12 to £12.5 million in 2012-13, and is likely to fall again to about £8 million in 2013-14.

Faryal Velmi, director of TfA, said she was more hopeful than she was before last year’s court ruling.

She said: “They are starting from scratch. Everything is up in the air. We do stand a good chance because we put in quite a strong submission.

“The number of organisations that have signed our submission reflects the wide support for the work that we do.”

News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com